Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Bassem Sobhy vs Luca Wiedenmann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sobhy vs Wiedenmann analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Bassem Sobhy vs Luca Wiedenmann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sobhy 0 - 0 Wiedenmann
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sobhy has won 45.42% of points on his second serve, while Wiedenmann has won 47.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sobhy, in recent form, has won 55.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wiedenmann has won 55.09%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.95% and 35.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sobhy has saved 42.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wiedenmann has saved 64.71% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sobhy has won 50% of matches played (W/L 23/ 23), with Wiedenmann winning 63.46% (W/L 33/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sobhy has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 39/ 48), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Wiedenmann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 62/ 19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 24/ 18).
- Player level: In the last year, Sobhy has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.11% of matches (W/L 23/ 22), where as Wiedenmann has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.91% of matches (W/L 29/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sobhy has played against opponents with an average rank of 48.37 while Wiedenmann has played against players with an average rank of 227.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sobhy has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wiedenmann has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sobhy has converted 44.17% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wiedenmann has converted 41.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
636
Rank
544
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
42% (56-78)
Career Total W/L
69% (95-43)
55% (12-10)
YTD W/L
58% (7-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sobhy VS Wiedenmann H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Bassem Sobhy | Luca Wiedenmann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 55% (12/10) | 58% (7/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (27/23) | 55% (16/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (231/193) | 55% (144/118) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 71% (5/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.19 | 0.28 |
| Aces Total | 39 | 35 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:40 | 1:56:37 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 26.45 | 341.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (561/1016) | 59% (509/870) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (369/561) | 71% (362/509) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (219/455) | 48% (173/361) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (60/137) | 41% (44/107) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (466/1051) | 43% (374/863) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (12/9) | 60% (6/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (11/21) | 58% (7/12) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 50% (6/3) |
Michael Bassem Sobhy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Radovan Michalik
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Mubarak Shannan Zayid
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yurii Dzhavakian
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
59%
(
47 of
79)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
5
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
88
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zura Tkemaladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Saba Purtseladze
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
33%
(
18 of
54)
10
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Bassem Sobhy
Player
Adrian Oetzbach
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
82
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 1-2 ret. | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Oetzbach
Player
Michael Bassem Sobhy
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
35 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Luca Wiedenmann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
48%
(
36 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Giovanni Calvano
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
63%
(
75 of
119)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
107)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
59 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
48 of
107)
108
Total Points Won
118
|
0-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Paul Woerner
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
32 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
93)
9
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
14
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Ye Cong Mo
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
58%
(
22 of
38)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
18%
(
7 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Nikola Basic
57%
(
60 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
66 of
109)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
41 of
66)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
35 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
118
Total Points Won
97
|
6-7(11) 6-0 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
Player
Luca Wiedenmann
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
7 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Wiedenmann
Player
Louis Tessa
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Sobhy Vs Wiedenmann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Luca Wiedenmann
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
